Tuesday, March 20, 2012

entry 3_ Bui Thi Kieu Nga


1. item 1:

Exhibit 2-14: Harvard's "National Leadership Index" Survey (2007)

Published: 10/13/2009 12:05 PM ET
Researchers at Harvard University's John F. Kennedy School of Government polled 1,207 adults in September 2007 to ascertain the public's 'confidence' in American leaders in a variety of sectors, including the military, business, government and the media. The poll (PDF) found 'leaders in the press have inspired less confidence than leaders in any other sector during each of the three years of the National Leadership Index (2005-2007),' with the military garnering the most public confidence. Americans told pollsters they thought the press was 'too liberal' and focused on trivialities; nearly two-thirds said they did not trust media coverage of the presidential campaign.

KEY FINDINGS:
·                                 '64% of Americans say they do not trust the news media's campaign coverage.'
·                                 By a two-to-one margin, (61% to 30%), Americans say they 'believe the news media's election coverage is politically biased.'
·                                 Of those who saw bias, most (40%) said the bias favored liberals, compared to 21% who saw a pro-conservative bias.
·                                 While 68 percent of Republicans 'believe that the press is too liberal,' vs. 10 percent who saw a conservative bias, Democrats 'are statistically equally likely to believe that the press is too conservative (28%) or too liberal (25%).'
·                                 '88% somewhat or strongly agree that the news media focuses too much on trivial rather than important issues.'
·                                 '84% believe the news media has too much influence on voters' decisions.'

Media Bias 101 Home

Source: http://www.mrc.org/node/29234

Bias: Assumption
 Analyse: the number of people taking part in the reasearch is not big enough to jump into a reasonable conclusion

2. item 2:

Bias: Assumption (the part of video from 0 to 54th second)
Analyse: Sarah Palin assumed that Obama might bring back the racial discrimination just based on her limited knowledge about what hadn't happend in the future.

item 3:




Bias: stereotype
Analyse: the picture shows that men earn more money than women







3 comments:

  1. In my opinion, in your item 3, the picture also contains discrimination. From what I can see, although the BLACK man is standing on a higher pile of bigger coins, looking directly at the woman, smiling happily, showing his hand ready to shake, the WHITE woman seem not to be interested. She is putting her both arms on hip, looking the other way. Also, the way they are standing somehow shows their attitude. To conclude, it must be discrimination against the black men.
    On the other hand, from what you've detected and the difference between their color, I'm not sure but there may be a problem about the black earn more than the white. :D

    ReplyDelete
  2. As far as I concern, the item 3 also a prejudice: men earn more than women

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree with Van Anh about your 3rd item, it also has some discrimination factor, but just in the way the woman react with the men.About the earning, I think it's just sexism-Men earn more than women like you analysed

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.