Item 1
At the Question Period in the House of Commons Canada, Vic Toews Minister of Public Safety said "You can stand with us, or you can stand with the child pornographers”.
Analysis:
False dilemma: in fact, there are not only 2 choices (you can choose to be neutral).
Item 2
- If you drink Stampede Light Plus, you will be smart. (If A, then B)
- If you don’t drink SLP, you won’t be smart. (If not A therefore not B)
However, you can still be smart without drinking SLP.
- The right structure:
If A, then B
Not B
Therefore, not A
Item 3
Thus, marriage - for all its flaws and miseries - has evolved to promote, support and nurture that basic necessary unit. If the state goes out of its way to make marriage attractive, it is because marriage is so difficult and, in many ways, unnatural. It is far more natural for humans, animals that we are, to enjoy gratification whenever and wherever than it is to settle for decades into a system of monogamy.
...............
We should look long and hard before we leap.
Analysis: Content fallacies: Appeal to traditional. (people forbid gay marriage because it's against the civilized human society and basic necessary unit)
-----------
Source:
Item 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X-eeP6IVlLU
Item 2: http://www.extratv.com/2008/08/20/first-look-jessica-simpsons-stampede-ad/
Hi, Ngoc
ReplyDeleteYour entry is quite good, but from my point of view, item 2 doesn't contain structural fallacy. It just shows the slogan but doesn't mention that if you don't drink Stampede Light Plus, you aren't smart.